<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Sui Generis - Latest Comments in Does Twitter Spam Really Matter? | Sui Generis</title><link>http://derrickkwa.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://derrickkwa.disqus.com/does_twitter_spam_really_matter_sui_generis/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:35:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Does Twitter Spam Really Matter? | Sui Generis</title><link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/does-twitter-spam-really-matter/#comment-1823015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the alternative doesn't have to be captchas, that's just what Adam Ostrow suggested. Do you have any other possible alternatives? Personally, I don't like the idea of captchas in general.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derrick Kwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:35:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Twitter Spam Really Matter? | Sui Generis</title><link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/does-twitter-spam-really-matter/#comment-1823014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. It's not a problem. If some spammer wants to follow you ignore or block. Not hard.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;If the alternative is captchas, it looks like even less of a problem to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Brie's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/briealeida/statuses/792651322" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/briealeida/statuses/792651322"&gt;briealeida: It's raining and . I walked to campus. Boo!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:51:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Twitter Spam Really Matter? | Sui Generis</title><link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/does-twitter-spam-really-matter/#comment-1823013</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hm. Interesting point. I didn't think about that. But yeah, I don't really think that should be a big issue. Glad to see someone agrees with me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derrick Kwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:53:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Twitter Spam Really Matter? | Sui Generis</title><link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/does-twitter-spam-really-matter/#comment-1823012</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It doesn't matter at all. People basically fear that the spammer achieving additional links on the back of their little slice of twitterdom somehow takes away from their legitimacy. It's similar to a person who gets salty about a co-worker's promotion when that co-worker did not work as hard and perhaps doesn't deserve the new title, pay, fame, fortune, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;twitter spam's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.twitterspam.com/post/32040091" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.twitterspam.com/post/32040091"&gt;It's not twitterspam&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter spam</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>