<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Sui Generis - Latest Comments in The Right Connections</title><link>http://derrickkwa.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://derrickkwa.disqus.com/the_right_connections_sui_generis/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:36:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Right Connections</title><link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-right-connections/#comment-1823054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah. I used "connections" because it's a more general term, I guess. "Correlations" (in my mind) connotes a relationship with math, which I wanted to avoid. Good point, though. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derrick Kwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:36:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Right Connections</title><link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-right-connections/#comment-1823053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think "correlations" is a better term than "connections". Correlations can be spurious, and statistical analysis is required to rule out other underlying causes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hun Boon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:09:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>